Evaluation Evaluation  
  UB Home > Schools and Programs Portfolio > Learning & Teaching > Evaluation Go to Quickfinder Go to our Contacts Page Search our site Go to Internal site

Learning & Teaching Home
Governance and Management
Plans, Policies and Committees
Professional Development
Staff Recognition & Rewards
Eval of Learn'g & Teach'g
Evaluation of Teaching
Evaluation of Courses
Graduate Perceptions
Graduate Outcomes
Review and Improvement

Evaluation of Teaching (Results of SET)


How the University uses the SET data
How the staff member uses the SET data







How the University uses the SET data

SET is a scheme designed to assist individual staff members to obtain structured feedback from students on their teaching by use of paper-based questionnaires. It is intended that the staff members concerned make use of the student feedback to make improvements to their teaching - a process that the University supports through both structured and negotiated staff development and program development services. SET data is tabled to the University Promotions Committee as part of a folio of evidence and accompanied by the staff member’s associated reflections and actions. Supervisors discuss SET results with individual staff members as part of annual performance review.

How the staff member uses the SET data

SET is used by the teacher to gather information about their teaching style and performance as reflected in the responses of their students. Staff can conduct evaluations at any time in the semester and as many times as they feel is appropriate.

SET feedback is confidential to the staff member and student respondents remain anonymous. SET feedback is used for reflection with the staff member’s supervisor for the annual performance review and for the purposes of one form of evidence of teaching performance in academic promotion.

The SET questionnaires are made up of three principal parts.

  • The first ten items which serve summative, diagnostic, management oriented and quality assurance functions. 
  • The second ten items (which are optional) which serve formative, diagnostic, individual oriented and quality enhancement functions. 
  • The students' open ended written comments.

The first ten items of the questionnaire are standard across the University. Items 1 to 8 have been selected on the basis that they each focus upon a different aspect of teaching which research evidence suggests is important to good teaching. The eight aspects are:

Eight critical aspects of teaching

  1. The educational aims and objectives for the teaching (Aims and objectives)
  2. The teacher's content knowledge and pedagogical skills (Knowledge and teaching skills)
  3. The teacher's personal characteristics (Teacher's characteristics)
  4. The teacher's concern for students and their learning (Concern for students)
  5. The teacher's engagement with, and commitment to, the use of formative assessment procedures (Assessment supports learning)
  6. The teacher's focus on encouraging deep learning outcomes (Promoting understanding)
  7. The curriculum design, which the teacher is responsible for (this includes consideration of the learning environment and the use of teaching materials and aids) (Curriculum design)
  8. The teacher's commitment to improving their teaching. (Commitment to improvement)

There are ten standard items for recording a ranking in the SET questionnaire:

SET Standard Items
1 The teacher makes clear what I have to do to be successful in this 'course'.
2 The teacher is skilled at developing a class atmosphere conducive to learning.
3 The teacher has a good manner (e.g. friendly, helpful, professional, enthusiastic).
4 The teacher shows genuine concern for student progress.
5 The teacher provides feedback which is constructive.
6 The teacher helps me to improve my understanding of concepts.
7 The teacher presents the course content in ways that help me to understand.
8 The teacher shows genuine interest in improving his/her teaching.
9 The teacher sets tasks which are useful as learning experiences.
10  Overall, how would you rate the teaching in this course?

The order of items 1 to 8 is not arbitrary. Rather, the order is such that good performance on the first items is (to some extent) a prerequisite for good performance in subsequent items. Thus, for example, if the specification of aims and objectives is poor (item 1), it is difficult to do well on all the subsequent areas.

Item number 9 has been selected on the basis that assessment strategies are particularly important. This additional item signals the importance of this aspect of teaching/ course design.

Item number ten is an overall question.

Staff may customise the evaluation in a variety of ways by selecting from a bank of questions grouped by the type of teaching situation for the course such as:

Teaching Situations

Small group lecturing

Problem based teaching

Teaching using technology

Clinical teaching

Design teaching

Tutorial/ seminar based teaching

Laboratory teaching

Performing and visual arts/ studio teaching

Distance teaching

Large group lecturing

 

 

And may further customise the evaluation by selecting from an additional bank of questions to focus on any of the following issues in greater depth:

Greater Depth Questions

Aims and objectives

Knowledge and teaching skills

Teacher’s characteristics

Concern for students

Assessment supports learning

Promoting understanding

Curriculum design

Commitment to improvement

SET Overall Satisfaction

Times series graph of SET overall satisfaction